FOREIGN MODELS OF THE SOCIAL MECHANISM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF LABOR POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article considers the problems of theoretical and applied aspects of the functioning of the social and labor sphere in the conditions of modern socio-economic transformations. A comprehensive analysis of foreign models of ensuring decent work at all levels of management of labor potential development is carried out, and the need to adapt the best world practices to Ukrainian realities is substantiated, taking into account national characteristics. It is determined that foreign models of the social mechanism of public management of labor potential development are based on an effective combination of state regulatory instruments, market mechanisms and social partnership institutions. Such models are aimed at improving the quality of the workforce, ensuring labor market flexibility, stimulating employment and proper social protection of workers. It is proven that foreign experience confirms the effectiveness of the transition from traditional social security to the concept of social investment, within which the development of labor potential is considered as a key factor in ensuring sustainable economic growth. It is emphasized that Ukraine has chosen a strategic course for integration into the European Union, which is defined as a key priority of both foreign and domestic state policy, entailing profound institutional and socio-economic transformations. The implementation of the provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU involves not only the adaptation of national legislation to the norms of EU law, but also the implementation of European social standards in the process of forming and developing labor potential. In this regard, the study of foreign experience in the formation and development of labor policy, as well as mechanisms and instruments of public administration in developed and transitional European countries, with the aim of their further implementation in Ukraine, is of particular relevance.
References
2. Liashenko, T. (2018). Systema sotsialnoho partnerstva v Ukraini na suchasnomu etapi [System of social partnership in Ukraine at the present stage]. Naukovi zapysky IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, 3(89), 70–86. [in Ukrainian].
3. Marych, M., & Martyniuk, A. (2021). Rol profspilok u pidtrymanni nalezhnoho rivnia zhyttia pratsivnykiv [The role of trade unions in maintaining an adequate standard of living of employees]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 33, 1–7. [in Ukrainian].
4. Melnychuk, O. F. (2010). Funktsii kolektyvnoho dohovoru v rynkovykh umovakh [Functions of collective agreement in market conditions]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VDAU. 10, 363–366. URL: http://repository.vsau.org/getfile.php/1768.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. International Labour Organization. URL: https://geneva.mfa.gov.ua/posolstvo/2609-labour [in Ukrainian].
6. Bhende, P., Mekoth, N., Ingalhalli, V., & Reddy, Y. V. (2020). Quality of work life and work–life balance. Journal of Human Values, 26(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685820939380 [in English].
7. World Almanac and Book of Facts. (2016). New York: World Almanac Education Group. [in English].
8. International Labour Office. (2015). World employment report 2014–2015: Employability in the global economy – How training matters. Geneva. [in English].
9. NYS CSEA Partnership Training. (n.d.). Quality of work life grants program. URL: http://www.nyscseapartnership.org/website/quality-of-work-life-grants.cfm [in English].
10. Curtin University of Technology. (2015). Quality of working life survey 2015. URL: http://staff.curtin.edu.au/staff/services/home/qwlsurvey_2015.html [in English].
ISSN 
ISSN 
