The Procedure of Reviewing Articles

All articles submitted to the editorial board of the collection DNIPRO ACADEMY OF CONTINUING EDUCATION HERALD, Series: "Philosophy. Pedagogy".

Review stages:

  1. The author submits to the editorial board an article that meets the requirements.
  2. Check the article for anti-plagiarism. For all articles submitted for review the degree of uniqueness of the author's text is determined using the appropriate software.
  3. All manuscripts submitted to the editorial board of the collection are sent to the reviewer. Appoints reviewers by the editor-in-chief.
  4. Members of the editorial board of the collection may act as reviewers of articles.
  5. The reviewer, as a rule, within 3-5 days makes a conclusion about the possibility of printing the article (fills in a standardized form that contains the final recommendations).
  6. Reviewing is conducted confidentially on the principles of double-blind reviewing (bilateral "blind" reviewing when neither the author nor the reviewer know each other). The interaction between the author and the reviewers takes place through the publishing editor.
  7. If the reviewer indicates the need to make certain adjustments to the article, the article is sent to the author with a proposal to take into account comments in the preparation of an updated version of the article or to refute them with arguments. The author adds a letter to the revised article. The letter contains answers to all comments and explains all the changes that have been made in the article. The edited version is re-submitted to the reviewer for decision-making and preparation of a reasoned opinion on the possibility of publication.
  8. The final decision on the possibility and expediency of publication is made by the editor-in-chief and, if necessary, by a meeting of the editorial board as a whole.