LANGUAGE GAMES AS A METHOD OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS

Keywords: game, language game, methodology, philosophical analysis.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of game in philosophy and the use of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s language games as a method of philosophical analysis. In the contemporary scientific and social context, the notion of game ceases to be regarded solely as a form of entertainment and acquires the status of a universal category capable of modeling various social, cultural, and communicative processes. The author examines the evolution of philosophical understanding of game, from Johan Huizinga to modern approaches associated with language games and the postmodern reinterpretation of game as a form of social interaction and meaning-making. Particular attention is given to Wittgenstein’s concept of language games, which views language as an activity intertwined with specific social practices and the life of communities. L. Wittgenstein's approach allows to identify and examine specific cases of language use, track changes in meaning, analyse the rules governing communication, and distinguish contradictions and different interpretations of complex concepts. The article also highlights the work of contemporary researchers, such as Oskari Kuusela and Harold Garfinkel, who employ language games as a methodological tool that enables modeling complex linguistic and cultural processes, investigating the logic of statements, and analyzing their impact on the formation of social perceptions. The study demonstrates that game, as both a concept and a research method, becomes especially relevant in conditions of polyvariance inherent to contemporary social and communicative processes. The application of language games as a method of philosophical analysis allows to rethink traditional approaches to the study of language, communication, and social reality, while also offering new perspectives for interdisciplinary research, including ethics, political science, and sociology. The concept of language games as a method provides opportunities to analyze communication not only as a mechanism for information transmission but as a process of meaning-making that encompasses freedom, responsibility, and ethical reflection. Accordingly, the article emphasizes the significance of language games as a crucial tool for exploring complex social and cultural phenomena and for developing new methodological approaches in contemporary philosophy.

References

1. Barnett W. E. The Rhetoric of Grammar: Understanding Wittgenstein’s Method. Metaphilosophy. 1990. Vol. 21. № 1–2. P. 43–66.
2. Caillois R. Man, Play and Games [transl. by M. Barash]. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1961. 208 p.
3. Eisenack K., Reckien D. Climate Change and Simulation/Gaming. Simulation & Gaming. 2013. Vol. 44. № 2–3. P. 245–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113490568
4. Garfinkel H. Notes on Language Games as a Source of Methods for Studying the Formal Properties of Linguistic Events. European Journal of Social Theory. 2019. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 148–174. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018824733
5. Hadot P. Language Games and Philosophy [transl. by C. Fleming]. Journal of Continental Philosophy. 2022.Vol. 3. № 1–2. P. 175–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jcp202342044
6. Huizinga J. Homo Ludens. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1960. 220 p.
7. Kuusela O. The Method of Language-Games as a Method of Logic. Kuusela O. Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 142–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829751.003.0005
8. Li M., Gao X. Implementation of Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovation under Market-Based Environmental Regulation: An Evolutionary Game Approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022. Vol. 308. Article 114570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114570
9. Lysokolenko T., Buturlina O. Green Recovery of Ukraine: Analysis of Game Narratives. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2025. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n3p679
10. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. 209 p.
11. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations / ed. by P. M. S. Hacker, J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 592 p.
12. Wittgenstein L. The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958. 185 p.
13. Wyss S. Does Wittgenstein Have a Method? The Challenges of Conant and Schulte. Nordic Wittgenstein Review. 2015. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 167–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v4i1.3273
Published
2025-12-18
How to Cite
LYSOKOLENKO, T. (2025). LANGUAGE GAMES AS A METHOD OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Philosophy, Pedagogy, 2(2), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-7013/2025-2-2
Section
Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Philosophy, Pedagogy